Congratulations - you have completed .
You scored %%SCORE%% out of %%TOTAL%%.
Your performance has been rated as %%RATING%%
Your answers are highlighted below.
Question 1 |
Questions 1–3 refer to the passage below:
“And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare
That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;
That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;
That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;
That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;"
The English Bill of Rights, 1689
That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;
That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;
That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;
That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;"
The English Bill of Rights, 1689
The English Bill of Rights was written after which of the following conflicts?
English Civil War | |
Glorious Revolution | |
Seven Years' War | |
Nine Years' War |
Question 1 Explanation:
The correct answer is (B). The English Bill of Rights followed the Glorious Revolution, which was in 1688. None of the other options are contemporary with the Bill of Rights, and the Nine Years War (D) was a French War.
Question 2 |
Questions 1–3 refer to the passage below:
“And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare
That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;
That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;
That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;
That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;"
The English Bill of Rights, 1689
That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;
That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;
That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;
That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;"
The English Bill of Rights, 1689
The Bill of Rights established all of the following EXCEPT
constitutional monarchy | |
limited monarchy | |
parliamentary sovereignty | |
separation of church and state |
Question 2 Explanation:
The correct answer is (D). The passage refers to the “Lords Spiritual” (the bishops), the “Lords Temporal,” and the Commons as meeting together as a Parliament. Therefore, there is no separation of church and state. The Bill of Rights confirmed constitutional monarchy (A) and limited monarchy (B), which are the same thing, and parliamentary sovereignty (C), which is the notion that parliament, not the monarch, is supreme.
Question 3 |
Questions 1–3 refer to the passage below:
“And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare
That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;
That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;
That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;
That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;"
The English Bill of Rights, 1689
That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;
That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;
That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;
That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;
That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;"
The English Bill of Rights, 1689
Which of the following political philosophers would have been LEAST likely to agree with the sentiments expressed in the passage?
Thomas Hobbes | |
John Locke | |
Montesquieu | |
Jean-Jacques Rousseau |
Question 3 Explanation:
The correct answer is (A). The other three argued for limited government. Locke’s (B) writings inspired the Declaration of Independence, Montesquieu (C) advocated separation of powers, and Rousseau (D) wrote about the innate goodness of man. Hobbes, on the other hand, believed most people are incapable of governing themselves and need a strong monarch to reign them in.
Question 4 |
Questions 4–6 refer to the passage below:
“I am fully persuaded that we should hear of none of these infantine airs, if girls were allowed to take sufficient exercise, and not confined in close rooms till their muscles are relaxed, and their powers of digestion destroyed. To carry the remark still further, if fear in girls, instead of being cherished, perhaps, created, were treated in the same manner as cowardice in boys, we should quickly see women with more dignified aspects. It is true, they could not then with equal propriety be termed the sweet flowers that smile in the walk of man, but they would be more respectable members of society, and discharge the important duties of life by the light of their own reason. “Educate women like men,” says Rousseau, “and the more they resemble our sex the less power will they have over us.” This is the very point I aim at. I do not wish them to have power over men; but over themselves.
In the same strain have I heard men argue against instructing the poor; for many are the forms that aristocracy assumes. “Teach them to read and write,” say they, “and you take them out of the station assigned them by nature.” An eloquent Frenchman has answered them, I will borrow his sentiments. But they know not, when they make man a brute, that they may expect every instant to see him transformed into a ferocious beast. Without knowledge there can be no morality!"
Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women, 1792
In the same strain have I heard men argue against instructing the poor; for many are the forms that aristocracy assumes. “Teach them to read and write,” say they, “and you take them out of the station assigned them by nature.” An eloquent Frenchman has answered them, I will borrow his sentiments. But they know not, when they make man a brute, that they may expect every instant to see him transformed into a ferocious beast. Without knowledge there can be no morality!"
Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women, 1792
Wollstonecraft’s ideas presented in the passage would have been viewed in a negative manner in which of the following places?
coffee shops | |
masonic lodges | |
private academies | |
salons |
Question 4 Explanation:
The correct answer is (B). Masonic lodges did not admit women. The other locations were centers of Enlightenment thought, and salons (D) were run by women.
Question 5 |
Questions 4–6 refer to the passage below:
“I am fully persuaded that we should hear of none of these infantine airs, if girls were allowed to take sufficient exercise, and not confined in close rooms till their muscles are relaxed, and their powers of digestion destroyed. To carry the remark still further, if fear in girls, instead of being cherished, perhaps, created, were treated in the same manner as cowardice in boys, we should quickly see women with more dignified aspects. It is true, they could not then with equal propriety be termed the sweet flowers that smile in the walk of man, but they would be more respectable members of society, and discharge the important duties of life by the light of their own reason. “Educate women like men,” says Rousseau, “and the more they resemble our sex the less power will they have over us.” This is the very point I aim at. I do not wish them to have power over men; but over themselves.
In the same strain have I heard men argue against instructing the poor; for many are the forms that aristocracy assumes. “Teach them to read and write,” say they, “and you take them out of the station assigned them by nature.” An eloquent Frenchman has answered them, I will borrow his sentiments. But they know not, when they make man a brute, that they may expect every instant to see him transformed into a ferocious beast. Without knowledge there can be no morality!"
Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women, 1792
In the same strain have I heard men argue against instructing the poor; for many are the forms that aristocracy assumes. “Teach them to read and write,” say they, “and you take them out of the station assigned them by nature.” An eloquent Frenchman has answered them, I will borrow his sentiments. But they know not, when they make man a brute, that they may expect every instant to see him transformed into a ferocious beast. Without knowledge there can be no morality!"
Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women, 1792
Which of the following documents most likely had the greatest influence on Wollstonecraft?
Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen | |
Leviathan | |
The Spirit of the Laws | |
Two Treatises of Government |
Question 5 Explanation:
The correct answer is (A). Wollstonecraft was heavily influenced by the French Revolution, which began in 1789, and by the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen in particular. Leviathan, written by Thomas Hobbes, had a very negative view of human beings, and The Spirit of the Laws, by Montesquieu, and Two Treatises of Government, by Locke, would have leaned toward Wollstonecraft but did not inspire a direct connection.
Question 6 |
Questions 4–6 refer to the passage below:
“I am fully persuaded that we should hear of none of these infantine airs, if girls were allowed to take sufficient exercise, and not confined in close rooms till their muscles are relaxed, and their powers of digestion destroyed. To carry the remark still further, if fear in girls, instead of being cherished, perhaps, created, were treated in the same manner as cowardice in boys, we should quickly see women with more dignified aspects. It is true, they could not then with equal propriety be termed the sweet flowers that smile in the walk of man, but they would be more respectable members of society, and discharge the important duties of life by the light of their own reason. “Educate women like men,” says Rousseau, “and the more they resemble our sex the less power will they have over us.” This is the very point I aim at. I do not wish them to have power over men; but over themselves.
In the same strain have I heard men argue against instructing the poor; for many are the forms that aristocracy assumes. “Teach them to read and write,” say they, “and you take them out of the station assigned them by nature.” An eloquent Frenchman has answered them, I will borrow his sentiments. But they know not, when they make man a brute, that they may expect every instant to see him transformed into a ferocious beast. Without knowledge there can be no morality!"
Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women, 1792
In the same strain have I heard men argue against instructing the poor; for many are the forms that aristocracy assumes. “Teach them to read and write,” say they, “and you take them out of the station assigned them by nature.” An eloquent Frenchman has answered them, I will borrow his sentiments. But they know not, when they make man a brute, that they may expect every instant to see him transformed into a ferocious beast. Without knowledge there can be no morality!"
Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women, 1792
Which of the following philosophers would have been most likely to agree with Wollstonecraft?
Condorcet | |
Diderot | |
Montesquieu | |
Voltaire |
Question 6 Explanation:
The answer is (A). All the others support women’s rights to an extent, but only Condorcet is considered a true feminist.
Question 7 |
Questions 7–8 refer to the passage below:
“In 1794 I was several times in Newgate on visits to persons confined for libel &c — one Sunday in particular I was there when several respectable women were also there — relatives of those I went to see. When the time for leaving the prison arrived we came in a body of nine or ten persons into a large yard which we had to cross — into this yard a number of felons were admitted and they were in such a condition that we were obliged to request the jailer to compel them to tie up their rags so as conceal their bodies which were most indecently exposed and was I have no doubt intentional to alarm the women and extort money from the men. When they had made themselves somewhat decent we came into the yard, and were pressed upon and almost hussled by the felons whose arms and voices demanding money made a frightful noise and alarmed the women. I who understood these matters collected all the halfpence I could and by throwing a few at a time over the heads of the felons set them scrambling swearing all but fighting whilst the women and the rest made their way as quickly as possible across the yard."
Francis Place, political activist, describing his visit to Newgate Prison in the mid-1790s
Francis Place, political activist, describing his visit to Newgate Prison in the mid-1790s
Which of the following characteristics most closely resembles the conditions or principals of Newgate Prison?
it barred female visitors | |
it emphasized reform over punishment | |
it gave its prisoners little clothing or money | |
it housed entire families together |
Question 7 Explanation:
The correct answer is (C). The passage says female visitors were present, so (A) may be eliminated. The stark conditions of the prison make it clear that reform (B) was not valued, and there is no evidence that families were housed together (D). The passage describes prisoners in rags, chasing after money, so (C) is correct.
Question 8 |
Questions 7–8 refer to the passage below:
“In 1794 I was several times in Newgate on visits to persons confined for libel &c — one Sunday in particular I was there when several respectable women were also there — relatives of those I went to see. When the time for leaving the prison arrived we came in a body of nine or ten persons into a large yard which we had to cross — into this yard a number of felons were admitted and they were in such a condition that we were obliged to request the jailer to compel them to tie up their rags so as conceal their bodies which were most indecently exposed and was I have no doubt intentional to alarm the women and extort money from the men. When they had made themselves somewhat decent we came into the yard, and were pressed upon and almost hussled by the felons whose arms and voices demanding money made a frightful noise and alarmed the women. I who understood these matters collected all the halfpence I could and by throwing a few at a time over the heads of the felons set them scrambling swearing all but fighting whilst the women and the rest made their way as quickly as possible across the yard."
Francis Place, political activist, describing his visit to Newgate Prison in the mid-1790s
Francis Place, political activist, describing his visit to Newgate Prison in the mid-1790s
At the time, this document would have been used to argue for which of the following?
Employment of prisoners | |
Improvements in living conditions | |
Prostitution reform | |
Stricter punishment |
Question 8 Explanation:
The correct answer is (B). As a political activist, Francis Place would have argued for prison reform. Employment of prisoners (A) and prostitution reform (C) are possibilities but are not directly stated. Stricter punishment (D) is completely wrong.
Question 9 |
Questions 9–11 refer to the map below:
The country that fell victim to its neighbors in 1795 was
Lithuania | |
Poland | |
Romania | |
Ukraine |
Question 9 Explanation:
The correct answer is (B). Poland was partitioned three times by Austria, Prussia, and Russia. The final time was in 1795.
Question 10 |
Questions 9–11 refer to the map below:
Which of the following ruled Russia at the time?
Alexander I | |
Catherine the Great | |
Ivan the Terrible | |
Peter the Great |
Question 10 Explanation:
The correct answer is (B). Catherine the Great ruled Russia from 1762 to 1796. All the other answers were Russian rulers but not in 1795.
Question 11 |
Questions 9–11 refer to the map below:
Who reconstituted Poland?
Francis II | |
Frederick the Great | |
Maximilien Robespierre | |
Napoleon Bonaparte |
Question 11 Explanation:
The correct answer is (D). Napoleon reconstituted Poland as the Grand Duchy of Warsaw in 1807. Francis II was the Holy Roman Emperor, Frederick the Great was king of Prussia and was one of the people who partitioned Poland prior to 1795. Maximilien Robespierre was the leader of France during the Reign of Terror.
Question 12 |
Questions 12–14 refer to the following illustration:
Based on the image, it can be inferred that the figure on the ground represents which of the following?
the First Estate | |
the Second Estate | |
the Third Estate | |
the conquered peoples of the French Empire |
Question 12 Explanation:
The correct answer is (C). The First Estate (A) is the clergy (on the left). The Second Estate (B) is the nobility (on the right). The Third Estate paid all the taxes in France and had few rights compared to the other two estates.
Question 13 |
Questions 12–14 refer to the following illustration:
The figure on the ground will be unlikely to get up because of the
autocratic rule of Louis XVI | |
lack of organized labor unions | |
restrictions from medieval guilds | |
voting arrangement in the Estates General |
Question 13 Explanation:
The correct answer is (D). Louis XVI (A) considered himself a divine-right monarch but was willing to share power with a legislature. Labor unions (B) were not relevant at this time. Guilds (C) were active, but the figure on the ground could not get up because the First and Second Estate could out vote the Third Estate in the Estates General.
Question 14 |
Questions 12–14 refer to the following illustration:
During which time period did the three-estate system exist in France?
prior to the French Revolution | |
during the Reign of Terror | |
about the time of the coronation of Napoleon | |
after the fall of Napoleon |
Question 14 Explanation:
The correct answer is (A). The division between the social classes in France was one of the causes of the French Revolution. This inequality was abolished by the time of the Reign of Terror (B).
Question 15 |
Questions 15–16 refer to the following illustration:
The figure above represents
the continental system | |
the middle passage | |
slave trade | |
triangle trade |
Question 15 Explanation:
The correct answer is (D). Triangle trade was named as such because the routes to Africa, Great Britain, and North America formed a triangle. The middle passage and slave trade were part of triangle trade but do not represent the entire system. The continental system was the blockade designed by Napoleon to paralyze Great Britain through the destruction of British commerce.
Question 16 |
Questions 15–16 refer to the following illustration:
Who would have been most likely to criticize triangular trade?
Oliver Cromwell | |
King George III | |
Maximilian Robespierre | |
Adam Smith |
Question 16 Explanation:
The correct answer is (D). Mercantilism helped create trade patterns such as the triangular trade across the North Atlantic, in which raw materials were imported to Britain and then processed and redistributed to other colonies. Adam Smith was a sharp critic of all mercantilist policies.
Question 17 |
Questions 17–18 refer to the passage below:
“Under the Consulate France reverted to a form of enlightened despotism, and Bonaparte may be thought of as the last and most eminent of the enlightened despots. Despotic the new regime undoubtedly was from the start. Self-governing through elected bodies was ruthlessly pushed aside. Bonaparte delighted in affirming the sovereignty of the people; but to his mind the people was a sovereign, like Voltaire’s God, who somehow created the world but never thereafter interfered in it. He clearly saw that a government’s authority was greater when it was held to represent the entire nation. In the weeks after Brumaire he assured himself of a popular mandate by devising a written constitution and submitting it to a gnarl referendum or “plebiscite.” The voters could take it—or nothing. They took it by a majority officially reported as 3,011,007 to 1,562.”
R.R. Palmer, A History of the Modern World, multiple editions
R.R. Palmer, A History of the Modern World, multiple editions
Which of the following best describes the religious beliefs of Napoleon Bonaparte?
Catholic | |
deist | |
Lutheran | |
Orthodox Christian |
Question 17 Explanation:
The correct answer is (B). Napoleon, like most prominent people who followed Enlightenment philosophy, was a deist—he believed in the existence of God, but unlike Christians, did not claim to know the nature of God and did not believe God intervened in human affairs.
Question 18 |
Questions 17–18 refer to the passage below:
“Under the Consulate France reverted to a form of enlightened despotism, and Bonaparte may be thought of as the last and most eminent of the enlightened despots. Despotic the new regime undoubtedly was from the start. Self-governing through elected bodies was ruthlessly pushed aside. Bonaparte delighted in affirming the sovereignty of the people; but to his mind the people was a sovereign, like Voltaire’s God, who somehow created the world but never thereafter interfered in it. He clearly saw that a government’s authority was greater when it was held to represent the entire nation. In the weeks after Brumaire he assured himself of a popular mandate by devising a written constitution and submitting it to a gnarl referendum or “plebiscite.” The voters could take it—or nothing. They took it by a majority officially reported as 3,011,007 to 1,562.”
R.R. Palmer, A History of the Modern World, multiple editions
R.R. Palmer, A History of the Modern World, multiple editions
From Palmer’s perspective, the reference to the vote is
conflated | |
decisive | |
erroneous | |
skeptical |
Question 18 Explanation:
The correct answer is (D). Palmer implies that Napoleon submitted a constitution to a plebiscite because he already knew what the result would be. The results of the vote may have been conflated (A), decisive (B), or erroneous (C), but Palmer is himself skeptical and uses the word “official” to indicate that the real vote total may have been something else.
Once you are finished, click the button below. Any items you have not completed will be marked incorrect.
There are 18 questions to complete.
List |
Next Practice Test:
Period 3 (1815–1914) >>